I have work in science for over 17 years for anyone to suggest consensus is science is ridiculous. Most of the scientist I know are highly biased which is often the reason they go into their field of study and to suggest one scientist is not as altruistic, i.e. Judith Curry, as another without presenting how they are falsely presenting their data is intellectually dishonest. It is nothing more than an effort to marginalize the individual and engaging in popular consensus building which is not science. Making statements without scientific data to backup ones statement or "copy and pasting" claims that contain no scientific data are worthless efforts to marginalize through consensus. If you truly wish to be scientific, you must weigh all data. From what Orion has presented in the graph above and my knowledge of the data, the man-made computer models are highly flawed. Since 1998 when Global warming, now Global climate change, became vogue, CO2 has increase by >80ppm (NOAA) and the average global temperature has decreased by ~0.46ºC (UAB satellite data), but 0.19ºC higher than normal average.