avaldes Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 If the change in US policy spurs new investment in Cuba, I wonder what the effect might be on tobacco infrastructure? Massive cash infusion might just bring new supplies and better facilities to the farm and production of the crops. I would love to see something positive come out of improved relations with Cuba. Subsistence farming has been a way of life for quite a long time, will this mean that the guardians of the land get a little payback for all of their contributions to the world of cigars? When we look back at the fabulous cigars of the 80's, lots of people talk about how the Soviet support helped farmers. I can't help but think that we might be on the verge of some really great things. -Aaron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dvickery Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 In a word ... No . Bureaucrats will line their pockets first . Habanos management will line their pockets next . Or to put it another way ... In Canada ...when the price of bread goes up ... How much of that increase goes to the wheat farmers ??? Derrek 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garbandz Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 Just like "Massive Cash Infusion" in any other third world country,the people who need it most will never see it. Unless it drives by in the form of a new Mercedes or Cadillac....... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginseng Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 In a word ... No . Bureaucrats will line their pockets first . Habanos management will line their pockets next . Or to put it another way ... In Canada ...when the price of bread goes up ... How much of that increase goes to the wheat farmers ??? Derrek I'm afraid I'm inclined to agree. I just can't see any other path given the parameters of the situation: deprivation, corruption, the challenge of taking personal-scale capitalism to market scale capitalism, dearth of discipline as pressured by time. Wilkey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puros Y Vino Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 I agree. Cash wouldn't make it to its' intended targets. Perhaps tools and equipment sent over to replace/augment existing inventory? Or would a bureaucrat flip a few tractors for cash? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leftimatic Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 I have a feeling these talks are only going to benefit a few large corporations frothing at the mouth to get a chance at exploiting another small country. Trade agreements never ever benefit the backs that truly supply the foundation upon which the trade is built upon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fosgate Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 I doubt it would line the pockets in such an obvious tone. You guys forget that Castro and Che used the corruption of govt who took cash for themselves and extravagant lifestyles from foreign companies. That corruption and flamboyance gave the people the motivation to rebel and also seize foreign businesses. No, the people have lived on so little for decades with the fault of their meager life styles laid at fault by the Embargo. They people are going to expect things to change with it coming to pass. The government will first focus on infrastructure and there will be a lot of demand for those improvements. When they quickly realize they cannot deliver fast enough they will be forced to look at better agriculture techniques. However, some things within tobacco production will not change. I am sure they will probably not change the areas where Habanos are selectively grown as they have always embraced they way they are grown and made. If anything I see them not changing for Habanos other than maybe rolling out different price tier of their lower tobacco grades for export and command a premium for their existing Habanos. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canadianbeaver Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 Do you think there will be three levels of cigar collectibility, quality and pricing, based on the resources made available? Pre embargo. Embargo. Post Embargo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geaux Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 It will make it worse -- The money will only increase the ability and will of the oppressors. Communism never benefits the people or the infrastructure - only the elite oppressors and their agenda of staying elite. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smallclub Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 Do you think there will be three levels of cigar collectibility, quality and pricing, based on the resources made available? Pre embargo. Embargo. Post Embargo. Good question. Actually, even if it doesn't become technically a reality, I'm sure the US cigar merchants will use the "post embargo" qualification; I would do it if I were in their situation! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tippexx Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 I'm wondering if this Thread isn't a little late .... China is already there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGC Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 I'm wondering if this Thread isn't a little late .... China is already there. When money flows through the hands of very few, it is highly unlikely that it will easily reach the people that have little. Those with the money and power will fight to keep the cash flowing through their own hands. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BradNC Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 We would have to ask China what they think since we would have to borrow the money from them to infuse anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PapaDisco Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 Don't forget: they still have to sort out the whole Trademark thing with Cuban cigars. There's an entire industry of non-Cuban Romeo & Julietta's, HdM's, Partagas, etc. that are manufacturing under those labels an who had their property (trademarks included) seized by Castro. I'm guessing if the embargo ends, it will end first for generic goods. Branded stuff with non-Cuban makers is going to face a whole lot of customer confusion and legal challenges, at least IMHO! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwtharp Posted December 19, 2014 Share Posted December 19, 2014 I don't expect good to come of it and I hear the knockoffs being rolled now! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avaldes Posted December 19, 2014 Author Share Posted December 19, 2014 The only non-Altadis cigars that use Cuban brand names are owned by General Cigar. I seriously doubt they have any kind of claim to pre-embargo ownership. But other than speculation, what do any of us really know. I asked this question to see if anyone thought that Habanos would be better off with more operating capital....which could lead to better lives for tobacco farmers and better cigars for us. We always hear how they have very little fertilizer, which partially contributed to the reduction in ligero thru the years....Just thinking out loud... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now