|
  |
|
|
Feb 4 2010, 03:50 AM
|

Perlas

Group: Members
Posts: 37
Joined: 11-January 09
Member No.: 4,988

|
Price was certainly a factor when I first started, but like thechenman mentioned, the main determinants now are time and weather.
--------------------
Justice is not to be taken by storm. She is to be wooed by slow advances. -Benjamin Cardozo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 4 2010, 02:19 PM
|
Perlas

Group: Members
Posts: 8
Joined: 8-December 09
From: Pennsylvania, USA
Member No.: 6,060

|
Sorry to ask but why is CC small anyway in ring gauge? I have notice alot of cc sites around 4x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 5 2010, 05:58 AM
|

Campanas
  
Group: Members
Posts: 197
Joined: 17-November 09
From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Member No.: 5,972

|
QUOTE (Trex @ Feb 3 2010, 11:19 PM)  Sorry to ask but why is CC small anyway in ring gauge? I have notice alot of cc sites around 4x We might have a bit of a disconnect. By "C&C" I was referring to "Cheap & Cheerful", the sub-forum name and lately coined term for less expensive Havanas... not the all encompassing "CC" for "Cuban Cigar". For a good overview of what C&C's include, see: A Classification of Cuban Cigars, into four "tiers"
C&C's (cheap & cheerfuls) tendency toward smaller RG's has to be a function of the simple economics of producing less expensive cigars (less tobacco involved, easier to roll) and their lineage (most are either machine-made or handmade versions of cigars that used to be machine-made). As far as the general CC (Cuban cigar) population goes, we do seem to be seeing more new releases in larger RG's. At the same time, though, we're losing some really nice smaller RG's.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 5 2010, 06:06 AM
|
Perlas

Group: Members
Posts: 8
Joined: 8-December 09
From: Pennsylvania, USA
Member No.: 6,060

|
ah,Thanks for the info and correction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 8 2010, 09:52 AM
|
Perlas

Group: Members
Posts: 26
Joined: 2-October 08
From: San Francisco
Member No.: 4,335

|
I like both large and small cigars. However, when I do smoke smaller ringed cigars, it's not because of economics. As others have attested, it's usually because of time. Also, I think smaller ringed cigars can sometimes have more intensity of flavor because of the wrapper to filler ratio. I think you usually get more bang for your buck in the smaller vitolas but often they aren't necessarily better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 9 2010, 11:34 AM
|
Campanas
  
Group: Members
Posts: 290
Joined: 20-October 09
Member No.: 5,865

|
QUOTE (Disburden @ Aug 8 2010, 11:06 AM)  Lately I have found I really like a longer skinnier vitola over the Robusto sized cigars. I used to only really smoke robustos up to about two months ago and then I got into the skinnies. I love them, they feel right in the hand, smoke is interesting, etc. I really like the Bolivar Corona Extra vitola and the longer cigars like the Lancero or Monte Especial. To Each His Own...Enjoy!!!
--------------------
...a watched pot never boils
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|