• Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

  • Feedback



About nino

  • Rank
  • Birthday 02/16/1953

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
  • ICQ

Profile Information

  • Location
    This planet
  • Interests
    Food, Books, Travel, Friends

Recent Profile Visitors

5,868 profile views
  1. @Ken Gargett - that was a few years before my time then, I stand corrected. I've never seen a letter on the wall there
  2. Ken > Have never seen ANY letter by Clinton * or any other politician Cuban or foreign * on the wall there in more than 10 years frequenting that store. Not sure we talk about the same store ...
  3. Well, here is another view of the same regulations - cannot see it changes anything from the opening article by Brookings ... CUBA IMPOSES MORE TAXES AND CONTROLS ON PRIVATE SECTOR AND INCREASES CENSORSHIP ON THE ARTS Posted on July 12, 2018 by Arch Ritter BY NORA GÁMEZ TORRES The Cuban government announced that it will start issuing licenses to open new businesses — frozen since August 2017 — but established greater controls through measures intended to prevent tax evasion, limit wealth and give state institutions direct control over the ‘self-employment’ sector Original Article: TAXES, CONTROLS, CENSORSHIP The Cuban government issued new measures on Monday to limit the accumulation of wealth by Cubans who own private businesses on the island. The provisions stipulate that Cubans may own only one private enterprise, and impose higher taxes and restrictions on a spectrum of self-employment endeavors, including the arts. The government announced that it will start issuing licenses to open new businesses — frozen since last August — but established greater controls through a package of measures intended to prevent tax evasion, limit wealth and give state institutions direct control over the so-called cuentapropismo or self-employment sector. The measures will not be immediately implemented. There is a 150-day waiting period to “effectively implement” the new regulations, the official Granma newspaper reported. Cubans who run private restaurants known as paladares, for example, will not be able to rent a room in their home to tourists since no citizen can have more than one license for self-employment. “There are workers who have a cafeteria and at the same time have a manicure or car wash license. … That is not possible. In practice, he is an owner who has many businesses, and that is not the essence and the spirit of the TCP [self-employment], which consists of workers exercising their daily activities,” Marta Elena Feitó Cabrera, vice minister for labor and social security, told the official Cubadebate site. About 9,000 people, half in Havana, are affected by the measure, said the official. In addition, all private sector workers must open an account in a state bank to carry out all their business operations. And the boteros, those who work as private taxi drivers, must present receipts to justify all their deductible expenses. Other measures curb the hiring of workers in the private sector, which currently employs 591,456 people, or 13 percent of the country’s workforce. The government also stated it would eliminate the tax exemption for businesses that have up to five employees and would instead impose a sliding scale that increases with each worker hired. It also ordered an increase in the required minimum monthly taxes of businesses in various categories. Government officials quoted by Granma said that the measures will increase tax collection and reduce fraud. But economists have warned that more taxes on hiring employees could dramatically hamper the development of the private sector at a critical moment. A monetary reform — which could bankrupt nearly half of the state companies, potentially leaving thousands unemployed — is expected to happen soon. The new measures also maintain a halt on new licenses for things such as “seller vendor of soap” and “wholesaler of agricultural products,” among others. One significant provision states that those who rent their homes to tourists and nationals may also rent to Cuban or foreign companies but “only for the purpose of lodging.” That would presumably prevent renters from subletting units. The “rearrangement” of self-employment, as the new measures were framed in the official media, reduces licenses by lumping together various elements of one industry while limiting another. For example, while there would be only one license for all beauty services, permits for “gastronomic service in restaurants, gastronomic service in a cafeteria, and bar service and recreation” were separated — meaning that one can own a restaurant but not also a bar. To increase controls, each authorized activity will be under the supervision of a state ministry, in addition to the municipal and provincial government entities, which can intervene to set prices. The level of control reaches such extremes that the Official Gazette published a table with classifications on the quality of public restrooms and the leasing rates that would have to be paid by “public bathroom attendants,” one of the authorized self-employment categories. Some public bathrooms are leased by the state to individuals who then are responsible for upkeep and make their money by charging users a fee. The regulations are the first significant measures announced by the government since Miguel Díaz-Canel was selected as the island’s new president in April. But the proposed regulations had been in the making for months by different government agencies, according to a draft of the measures previously obtained by el Nuevo Herald. The announcement comes just as the Cuban economy is struggling to counter the losses brought by the crisis in Venezuela — its closest ally — and the deterioration of relations with the United States. The new measures could also have a significant impact on the cultural sector. The decree may be used by the Ministry of Culture to increase control over artists and musicians and impose more censorship in the country. Decree 349 of 2018 establishes fines and forfeitures, as well as the possible loss of the self-employment license, to those who hire musicians to perform concerts in private bars and clubs as well as in state-owned venues without the authorization of the Ministry of Culture or the state agencies that provide legal representation to artists and musicians. Many artists in urban genres such as reggaeton and hip-hop, who have been critical of the Cuban government, do not hold state permits to perform in public. However, many usually perform in private businesses or in other venues. Painters or artists who sell their works without state authorization also could be penalized. The measures impose sanctions on private businesses or venues that show “audiovisuals” — underground reggaeton videos or independent films, for example — that contain violence, pornography, “use of patriotic symbols that contravene current legislation,” sexist or vulgar language and “discrimination based on skin color, gender, sexual orientation, disability and any other injury to human dignity.” The government will also sanction state entities or private businesses that disseminate music or allow performances “in which violence is generated with sexist, vulgar, discriminatory and obscene language.” Even books are the target of new censorship: Private persons, businesses and state enterprises may not sell books that have “contents that are harmful to ethical and cultural values.”
  4. A big step backwards for the Cuban economy : "The new regulations make one thing abundantly clear: The Cuban government, state-owned enterprises and the ruling Cuban Communist Party do not want to risk major competition to their own interests—economic, commercial, and political—from a potentially capital-rich, diversified emerging private sector. Apparently, perceived interests in security and stability have overruled Cuba’s own declared economic development goals." Cuba moves backwards: New regulations likely to impede private sector growth Richard E. Feinberg and Claudia Padrón Cueto Friday, July 13, 2018 In a leap backwards, the Cuban government has published a massive compendium of tough new regulations governing the island’s struggling private enterprises. The new regulations—the first major policy pronouncement during the administration of President Miguel Díaz-Canel—appear more focused on controlling and restricting the emerging private sector than on stimulating investment and job creation, more concerned with capping wealth accumulation than in poverty alleviation. Many small businesses that cater to foreign visitors are already suffering from Trump-era restrictions and travel warnings that have decimated the U.S. tourist trade in Havana. But the new regulations are more a product of domestic Cuban politics than foreign pressures. On a positive note, the Cuban government promises to renew the granting of licenses for many categories of private businesses by year-end, repealing the extended suspension announced last summer. But the new regulations greatly empower government rule-makers and intrusive inspectors, casting a gray cloud over the island’s business climate. Many existing businesses are likely to retrench if not close altogether. The private sector grew dramatically in recent years, to include nearly 600,000 owners and employees by official figures, with many more enterprising Cubans working informally; in contrast, the state sector stagnated and further decapitalized. Indeed, many thriving private businesses began to compete successfully against state entities, notably in restaurants, bars and night clubs, guest houses, construction, and transportation. The healthy wages paid by profitable private firms often eclipsed the meager salaries paid to disgruntled government officials and factory workers. The extensive, highly detailed regulations, which go into effect in December, read like “the revenge of the jealous bureaucrat.” Drawing on a multitude of ministries and operating at all levels—national, provincial, and municipal—interagency committees will now be empowered to authorize, inspect, and regularly report upon private businesses under their jurisdictions. The regulations are replete with astoundingly specific performance requirements and innumerable legal breaches that seem crafted to allow government officials wide discrimination to impose heavy fines (or extort bribes), suspend licenses, and even seize properties. To cite but a few such regulations: Private restaurants and guest houses must cook food at a minimum of 70 degrees Celsius for the time required for each food; day care centers must allocate at least two square meters per child, have no more than six children per attendant, and be outfitted with pristine bathroom facilities described in exquisite detail (private schools and academies are strictly prohibited); and private taxi drivers must document that they are purchasing fuel at government gas stations, rather than buying on the black market. Further, local officials can deny new licenses based on “previous analyses,” even if the proposed business plan meets all the other specifications, and can fix prices “when conditions warrant.” The regulations could help shield state enterprises from unwanted private competition. The very ministries that stand to lose market shares are in charge of approving licenses in their sector. For example, the ministry of tourism has the lead in judging licenses for private guest houses. Appeals are possible, but to administrative authorities, not to judicial courts. Government agencies are also seeking to reassert control over the island’s vibrant artistic communities. The regulations prohibit artists from contracting directly with private restaurants and bars; rather they must be represented by public-sector entities that charge commissions up to 24 percent of revenues. Moreover, performers must not use “sexist, vulgar or obscene language,” which if enforced could imply the banning of popular hip-hop and reggaeton songs and videos. Perhaps most telling are the restrictive rules squarely aimed at inhibiting private capital accumulation. In a sharp turn from past practice, Cubans will now only be allowed one license for one business, effectively outlawing franchising and diversification. Capacity at restaurants and bars is capped at 50 guests. Most biting, the new regulations establish an upward-sloping wage scale (whereby wages rise as more workers are hired); hiring more than 20 workers becomes prohibitively expensive (six times the average wage). Unlike in the past, employers will now have to pay taxes on the first five workers hired as well. Many private businesses must also record their transactions (revenues and expenditures) in an account at a government financial institution and keep three months of prospective taxes on deposit. Intended to reduce underreporting of income, this measure will significantly raise the effective rates of taxation. Investors must also explain their sources of funds. In a country where political authority is unchecked, these financial impositions alone will discourage many potential entrepreneurs. The Cuban authorities have repeatedly asserted their interest in attracting foreign investment, to compensate for weak domestic savings. However, foreign investors are likely to view these new regulations, even though they apply to domestically-owned firms, as indicative of an official wariness if not hostility toward private enterprise in general. Risk-averse foreign investors will also note that the Cuban government is quite capable of precipitously altering the rules of the game. The new regulations are the first major policy initiative promulgated during the administration of President Miguel Díaz-Canel. Many of the resolutions were approved by the Council of State under Raúl Castro, prior to Díaz-Canel’s inauguration in April, but nevertheless were issued during his young tenure. Not a good sign for those hoping that Díaz-Canel, 58 years old and ostensibly representing a younger generation, might quickly place his own imprimatur over the extensive state apparatus. The new regulations make one thing abundantly clear: The Cuban government, state-owned enterprises and the ruling Cuban Communist Party do not want to risk major competition to their own interests—economic, commercial, and political—from a potentially capital-rich, diversified emerging private sector. Apparently, perceived interests in security and stability have overruled Cuba’s own declared economic development goals.
  5. Pleasure @mbflash80 - I agree about our stuttering friend. Great guy and very happy he's taken over a new store. As for Habana Libre - I am sure Richard Pryor would laugh himself to death there - had he not died already - or be killed by exploding Guayabera belly-buttons from those lazy a## useless lounging lady managers ...
  6. I am pretty sure that Señor "Dyanna" bald, tall & pretty ugly ( except for his friends ) is no longer there - has been promoted to manager at another Casa del Tabaco across the harbour... sorry to have him so far away. Miss him. Really do. You have some high calibre guys ( and a ballsy lady ) there, like Andres who'd been heading the Comodoro Casa del Tabaco and was at Melia Habana LCDH long before that. All are some of the best in the business. You can do MUCH worse at Habana Libre .... believe me....
  7. I frequent that store ( which is an OFFICIAL Casa del Tabaco run by Caracol ) for more than 10 years. Always have a great time there, great service ( better than great really ) consider it one of my fav places to relax and chill out ( like many of my friends ) and get away from the hustle and bustle of the other ... cigar places. Never had any problem there whatsoever - All legit and above board. Regardless if you speak Spanish ( helps a lot specially in that store ) or not. Being next to El Aljibe you get a lot of people dropping in and asking for water from the moon ... Remember sitting there sipping rum one afternoon and 2 tourist ladies come in - first thing they wave at "all the terrible stinking smoke" and then they ask : "Do you have any Vanilla flavoured Cuban cigars".... I'd never buy singles in any store in Havana - at that store I'd buy unbanded anything and be sure I get the real deal. But then ... I spend a lot of time there and they might know my face. It's a very small place
  8. If Juanita is not at the Melia Cohiba then she's rolling across the street at the Riviera Hotel @oliverdst I can confirm that Jorge is no longer in Cuba - guess Maricela will be rolling Monsdales from now on... And good ol' Trelles can be found having a Cafecito at Club Habana most days.
  9. Naw, I guess nobody has to light up unless you are a fag addict @scap99 ... And it's not plexiglass. More like solid glass with pretty good ventilation. But as I mentioned before - you are always welcome to fly 600K air miles and join LH's HON Club for a more stylish "lounge" ... Me, I am happy to have a nice place to smoke a Corona and have a coffee next to my departure gate to Havana .... which is mostly the case. Any better place to smoke westbound of FRA ??
  10. Here is an overview of just the PUBLIC smoking lounges at FRA airport ( there are more, like private lounges, SEN/HON/Airline lounges etc ... ), these are just the lounges available to the public :
  11. Frankfurt has smoking lounges basically every 200 yards in all terminals - and if you are a Lufthansa HON Circle member ( tough to achieve but worth it ... ) you have a dedicated cigar lounge, showers, private passport control plus a PA taking you from the exclusive terminal right to the aircraft door in a Porsche or Mercedes ... Not bad - only problem is that Lufthansa doesn't fly to Havana
  12. Agree with you - old and touristy ... My personal best for cochinillo in Segovia is Meson Casa Candido.
  13. @Ryan That is most true, the Libreta affords noboby more than 10 days of basic subsistence. If you understand a bit of Spanish, as regrettably this docu has not been sub-titled, this award-winning documentary ( censored and prohibited in Cuba ) will explain the life of "John without nothing" - a typical Cuban worker trying to survive on the Libreta and his salary ...
  14. Mercedes Benz 180 - back in the early sixties it took 3 days to drive from central Germany to Spain .... Still see like 4-5 of them in Havana every day... :-)

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.